MemoryReviews

Essencore KLEVV CRAS XR5 RGB 32GB DDR5-6200 CL40 Memory Kit Review

Performance

Our test platform contains an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X processor, Gigabyte B650E AORUS Master motherboard, and Powercolor RX6800XT Red Devil 16GB graphics card. All tests were performed on Windows 11 Pro x64 with the latest updates.

Our comparison includes overclocking results and settings where the KLEVV CRAS XR5 32GB DDR5-6200 memory kit was stable. The maximum stable frequency using the mentioned motherboard was DDR5-6400 CL30-39-39 1.45V. Since the new AMD is limited to this memory clock, we couldn’t set anything higher.

We will start with the AIDA64 Memory and Cache benchmark, probably the best application to check memory bandwidth and latency.

The results at overclocked settings show significantly higher bandwidth in the AIDA64 benchmark. It’s almost always the case as manufacturers keep safe timings and frequencies for high stability and compatibility purposes. The XMP profile is performing well, considering its quite relaxed timings.

The latency test shows how high the difference is between the XMP and overclocked settings. 72.2ns is still not a bad result compared to some memory kits previously reviewed, but we wish it to be lower.

AIDA64 tests are fully synthetic and usually do not present real-world performance. The next tests should give a better view of the daily performance.

In previous reviews, we could see higher differences at overclocked settings, while here, the XMP is not so much slower. It confirms that the XMP performs well.

One more time, 3DMark benchmarks barely show any differences in all our settings.

Blender is scaling well with the frequency and tighter timings, but the performance gain at overclocked settings is also barely visible.

The same Final Fantasy XV and Superposition benchmarks have all results close to the error margin.

Results in games finally show something higher. It’s nothing significant but overclocking gave us between 2-8FPS more, depending on the game.

KLEVV CRAS XR5 specifications don’t show the whole story, as the test results show that even at relaxed timings, this memory is fast. For the AMD platform on which it was tested, it seems like a great memory series.

 

Related posts

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More